What’s in the CTU Deal for the Kids?

This article has been updated to add more information on staffing to support English learners.

Late yesterday, the Chicago Teachers Union’s House of Delegates approved a tentative agreement in a tight vote. The CTU deal includes good pay and holds the line on health insurance premiums, but what’s in it for the kids? What will the new provisions on class size and staffing actually mean in schools? On a late, late night read, these are the provisions that stood out to me as mostly likely to give kids better experiences in school.

Class Size Relief Now Exists, But It’s Tricky

Let’s start with the issue the union has wanted to move on for years, as have many parents: class size. The good news here is that after 25 years of no real relief, this contract offers something. For the earliest grades (K-3), in high-need schools where class sizes are 32 students or more, teacher assistants could arrive as soon as second semester this year.

But overall, the relief provided in the CTU deal still isn’t enough to reduce class size everywhere it’s needed. More bad news: in truly overcrowded schools, class size relief will likely come in the form of an assistant teacher, not fewer kids in the room. Truly overcrowded schools are not likely to have the space to divide oversize classes into two separate classrooms.

Thanks to continued pressure from the union, Chicago Public Schools increased the amount of money available for class size relief to $35 million. The funds will be doled out by a joint CPS-CTU council. Neighborhood schools where at least 60 percent of students live in Tier 1 Census tracts will be first in line for relief funds. Possible means to relieve overcrowded classrooms include separating oversized classrooms, adding teacher assistants or reorganizing class schedules. The council can determine other solutions, but not ones that would create split-grade classrooms in elementary schools. That’s a win.

A Nurse and Social Worker in Every School? Maybe.

By 2023, CPS has agreed to fund enough nurse positions to have one in every school and to phase out its use of contract nurses, which parents say has put student health–and lives–at risk. The district has also agreed to invest at least $2 million over the next five years to reimburse tuition for nurses getting school nurse certification. Overall, the new contract will invest $70 million in a variety of new positions in the next five years.

However, the next challenge will be finding the people to fill those positions, especially nurses. For years, districts have faced a national shortage of school nurses. Also, noncompete agreements between the district and the staffing agencies currently providing contract nurses mean that many nurses now working in schools would not be eligible to move into the new district positions without taking a few months’ break.

In short, CPS has agreed to put the positions in place, but just because they built them doesn’t mean the nurses will come. It is also possible that experienced nurses may choose to move into open positions in more-advantaged schools, leaving the neediest schools still struggling to fill the role.

Similar issues are in play for school social workers. Elizabeth Weiss, a newly-hired social worker in CPS, recently published her story in Chalkbeat Chicago, describing the strengths and challenges of working in the district.

Meanwhile, to address the lack of school counselors, librarians and restorative justice coordinators, a joint staffing committee will identify 30 schools a year starting next school year where principals will be able to choose whether to add one staff position in any of these roles or spend the money on programming to address trauma, counseling or instruction.

The contract also guarantees private space for clinicians to work with students.

Reducing the Sub Shortage

The CTU deal didn’t win back 30 minutes of morning prep time for elementary teachers, but it attempts to address another source of angst that reduces prep time: lack of substitutes. The tentative agreement includes a number of measures intended to increase the supply and quality of substitute teachers, reducing pressure to pull teachers out of their prep time to cover classes.

Sub shortages and teacher vacancies are a huge problem in high-need schools on Chicago’s south and west sides. When teacher vacancies are filled by a rotating cast of substitutes, kids’ learning suffers. When special education teachers are absent, substitutes often lack the expertise to keep classes on track.

Under the new CTU deal, the district has promised to create a pool of special education subs. Retired special educators who are willing to sub in special education classes will receive higher pay. The district is also offering higher pay to subs willing to work in high-need schools and hiring additional cadre subs (eligible for health insurance) in high-need geographic areas.

In a move that won’t be well-understood beyond insiders, the district has offered to allow teachers to bank many more sick days than before: 244 versus 40. While those days can’t be cashed out upon retirement, they can count toward pension credit. Currently, teachers receive 13 paid sick days per year but cannot bank days beyond 40. Thus, more experienced teachers can face a “use it or lose it” situation with sick time. So the new policy could help reduce the need for subs.

There are also efforts to improve all substitutes’ skills. All substitutes will receive training on working with students in special education and English learners. Also, the contract dictates that special educators will be the last teachers called upon to cover classes if a substitute doesn’t show.

Protections to Ensure Kids Get Special Education, English Learner Services

In 2018, the State of Illinois found that Chicago Public Schools had been systematically delaying and denying services to students who qualified for special education. It appointed a state monitor to oversee reforms, but advocates and teachers charge that communication with parents and service improvements are slow in coming.

The CTU deal includes provisions intended to safeguard services for students in special education. In an attempt to reduce the perennial shortage of special educators, the district will allow special educators coming from elsewhere to carry over more years of service from their previous employment, raising their starting pay and possibly boosting their pensions.

CPS will also hire more case managers and take other measures to reduce the overwhelming paperwork special educators have traditionally managed on top of teaching students. High school co-teachers will have a maximum of three “preps” (three different courses to teach), and usually, two. Most high school teachers teach two courses, or “preps,” to five classes of students each day.

Many of the provisions regarding special education appear to be attempts to enforce common sense in a system where it can be sorely lacking. For example, if a student who has a one-to-one aide during the regular school year attends summer school, the aide who has a relationship with that student has first dibs on continuing to work with the student in summer school. Special educators are guaranteed access to data on their students: grades, tests and attendance. Principals are instructed to schedule simultaneous preparation time for subject-matter teachers and co-teachers “when administratively possible.” This allows for common planning time during the school day, which can be a rare commodity in schools.

Similarly, English learners in CPS have long been shorted services. The tentative agreement includes a whole new section of provisions addressing budget, curriculum and professional development for bilingual teachers. The required number of English learners for a school to receive a full-time coordinator drops to 150, and their scope of work is protected. To strengthen the pipeline of teachers earning ESL and bilingual endorsements, CPS will offer tuition discounts of at least 50 percent. As with the new provisions for special educators, these new rules for teachers and coordinators supporting English learners should allow them to focus more tightly on their students.

That’s what stood out to me. What stands out to you? What did I miss? Let us know in the comments.

A final word–my two favorite wins for kids in the CTU deal are: 1. guaranteed nap time for children in full-day preK and 2. a five-year deal, so their educations are guaranteed not to be interrupted again by contract talks for a long time.

Photo by Santi Vedrí on Unsplash

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
The following two tabs change content below.
Maureen Kelleher

Maureen Kelleher

Maureen Kelleher is a senior writer and editor at Education Post, but before that she spent a decade as a reporter, blogger and policy analyst. Her work has been published across the education world, from Education Week to the Center for American Progress. Between 1998 and 2006 she was an associate editor at Catalyst Chicago, the go-to magazine covering Chicago’s public schools. There, her reporting won awards from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the International Reading Association and the Society for Professional Journalists. A former high school English teacher, she is also the proud mom of an elementary student at Chicago’s Namaste Charter School. Find her on Twitter at @KelleherMaureen.

  2 comments for “What’s in the CTU Deal for the Kids?

More Comments